Which Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Benefit from Surgical Treatment? An Aid to Clinical Decision Making Berto J. Bouma, Renee B. A. van den Brink, K. Zwinderman, Emile C.
Cheriex, Hans H. P. Hamer, Kong I. Lie, Jan G. P. Tijssen |
|||||||
Background and aim of the study: Clinical decision-making
in an individual elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis (AS) is
difficult. The prognosis is influenced by increased age and various cardiac
morbidity and comorbidity, and the benefit of surgery is uncertain because
the prognosis with conservative treatment has rarely been described.
The study aim was to identify those patients who would gain from surgical
therapy. |
included. Of these patients, 120 underwent surgery. The seven-year predicted survival
ranged from 6.9% to 83% in surgically treated patient, and from 0.6% to
48% in conservatively treated patients. The benefit of surgical treatment
over conservative treatment was greatest in patients aged <80 years,
with a more critical AS, cardiac morbidity, and without (7-year survival
78% versus 14%) or with (7-year survival 56% versus 1%) comorbidity. Minimal
benefit was seen in patients aged >80 years with a less critical AS
and without cardiac morbidity. Conclusion: This model illustrated the benefit of surgical treatment over conservative treatment in 16 different profiles of elderly patients with severe AS. These findings may provide support for clinical decision making in individuals within this patient group The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2004;13:374-381 |
||||||
|
|||||||