Management of Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery with Mild to Moderate Aortic Stenosis Apostolos Karagounis, Oswaldo Valencia, Venkatachalam Chandrasekaran,
John Smith, Stephen Brecker, Marjan Jahangiri |
|||||||
Background and aim of the study: The management
of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with
mild to moderate aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial. The study
aim was to examine the outcome in patients with mild to moderate AS undergoing
CABG. |
There was no significant difference in postoperative complications.
The mean intensive care unit stay was 2.3 and 2.2 days, respectively (p
= NS); median postoperative stay was 6 and 8 days, respectively (p = 0.02).
During the median follow up period of 4.2 years no patient in group A required
AVR. Nine late deaths occurred in group B, none of which was cardiac-related. Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent combined surgery was comparable with that in patients who had isolated CABG. However, none of the patients who underwent only CABG required AVR during the follow up period. It is concluded that patients with mild AS at the time of CABG should not undergo AVR. It is possible that a cut-off AS gradient >40 mmHg should be considered for combined surgery. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2004;13:369-373 |
||||||
|
|||||||