Surgical Treatment of Infective Mitral Valve Endocarditis Markus J. Wilhelm, Reza Tavakoli, Kathrin Schneeberger, Simon Hörstrupp,
Oliver Reuthebuch, Burkhardt Seifert, Marko Turina, Michele Genoni |
|||||
Background and aim of the study: The approach
to mitral valve endocarditis is a surgical challenge, and the optimal
procedure remains a matter of debate. In this condition, mitral valve
repair appears feasible, but its long-term effects - as opposed to more
often practiced valve replacement - have not yet been determined. Herein,
the authors’ experience of surgical treatment of infective mitral
valve endocarditis is presented, with reference to surgical replacement
or reconstruction. |
long-term survival (p = 0.15), but there was a trend towards
better survival after reconstruction than replacement if only cardiac
deaths were considered (p = 0.1). At follow up, reconstruction patients
were significantly less frequently symptomatic (NYHA class III/IV) than
replacement patients (0% versus 29%; p = 0.002), had a lower incidence
of atrial fibrillation and need for pacemaker implantation (29% versus
47%; p = 0.04), and tended to have less dyspnea in daily life (20% versus
38%; p = 0.07). Reoperation in patients surviving more than 30 days was
more common in replacement than in reconstruction patients. |
||||
|
|||||