Clinical and Hemodynamic Performance of the 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic Bioprosthesis

Matthias E. W. Kirsch, Boyan Tzvetkov, Emmanuelle Vermes, Bruno Pouzet, Stéphane Sauvat, Daniel Loisance

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France

 

Background and aim of the study: The Medtronic Mosaic valve (MMV) is a latest generation supra-annular stented porcine valve, which combines a low-profile stent, leaflet fixation at zero pressure in a predilated aortic root, and amino-oleic acid anti-mineralization treatment for improved hemodynamics and durability. A study was conducted to evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic performances of the MMV in patients with a small aortic root (19 mm aortic annulus).
Methods: Between 1998 and 2004, 81 consecutive patients (69 females, 12 males; mean age 78.0 ± 5.5 years) underwent aortic valve replacement using the 19-mm MMV. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 28 patients (29.2%), and mitral valve surgery in one patient (1.2%).
Results: The 30-day mortality rate was 9.9% (eight deaths). Postoperative actuarial survival estimates were 90.1 ± 3.3%, 78.5 ± 4.6% and 69.1±5.5% at one month, one year and two years, respectively. After a mean follow up of 2.7 ± 1.9 years,

no cases of structural dysfunction, non-structural dysfunction or valve thrombosis were noted. Four ischemic cerebral complications (2.0% per patient-year (pt-yr)), five bleeding complications (2.0%/pt-yr) and two prosthetic valve infections (1.0%/pt-yr) were observed. No reoperation on a MMV was performed. Postoperatively, the mean systolic gradient was 23.4 ± 7.0 mmHg, and the effective orifice area (EOA) 1.06 ± 0.33 cm2. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM) was moderate (indexed EOA >0.65 cm2/m2 and £0.85 cm2/m2) in 40 patients (49.4%), and severe (indexed EOA £0.65 cm2/m2) in 41 (50.6%).
Conclusion: Although providing acceptable clinical results, implantation of the 19-mm MMV resulted in a high incidence of postoperative VP-PM. Hence, this valve should be reserved for patients in whom the projected indexed EOA calculated preoperatively is deemed acceptable, given the patient’s clinical condition.
The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005;14:433-438

 
Untitled Document
Registered Users
Click here to view the file in pdf format or click here to logout from the site

Subscribers

You must be a subscriber and registered with the site to view these files. If you are a subscriber but have not yet registered with the site please click here.


Not yet subscribed?
Click here to subscribe using our simple online system