Hemodynamic Evaluation
of the Sorin Soprano Bioprosthesis in the Completely Supra-annular Aortic
Position
Walter B. Eichinger, Florian Botzenhardt, Ina Wagner, Sabine Bleiziffer,
Daniel J. Ruzicka, Ralf Guenzinger, Robert Bauernschmitt, Ruediger Lange
German Heart Center Munich, Department
of Cardiovascular Surgery, Munich, Germany |
Background and aim of the study: The study aim
was to evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Sorin
Soprano bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Methods: Rest and stress echocardiography were performed
at six months after surgery in 57 patients who underwent aortic
valve replacement with the stented Soprano bioprosthesis. The exercise
protocol included workloads of 25, 50, 75 and 100 W, each of 2
min duration.
Results: Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (n = 1). Due to
malperfusion of the coronary arteries, two Soprano prostheses had
to be replaced by a different prosthesis, and one patient received
coronary artery bypass grafts. One patient developed bacterial
endocarditis of his prosthesis at seven months postoperatively
and died as a result of a fulminant sepsis. There were no other
prosthesis-related adverse events.
|
Mean pressure gradients (MPG) ranged from 7.8 to 15.9
mmHg, effective orifice areas (EOA) from 1.25 to 2.98 cm2, EOA index
(EOAI) from 0.79 to 1.43 cm2/m2, and EOA fraction from 34 to 45%. Stress
echocardiography showed no significant increase in MPG up to 50 W, and
MPGs did not exceed 35 mmHg at 75 and 100 W.
Conclusion: Initial hemodynamic results showed low MPGs
during rest and exercise. The EOAI was large due to completely
supra-annular placement of the Soprano valve. The difficulty of
complete supra-annular placement is that the prosthesis is positioned
relatively high, especially in narrow aortic roots, and this may
handicap coronary artery perfusion. Patient selection with suitable
aortic root anatomy is crucial to achieve the benefit of completely
supra-annular implantation without coronary ostium deterioration.
The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005;14:822-827
|