Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis after Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Could Early Reoperation be Prevented?

Jean Ph. Verhoye, Franceseca Merlicco, Ibrahim M. Sami, Giangiuseppe Cappabianca, Hervé Lecouls, Hervé Corbineau, Thierry Langanay, Alain Leguerrier
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ponchaillou, Rennes, France

 

Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to examine, retrospectively, the risk of accelerated progression of aortic stenosis (AS) and outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients who had undergone previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
Methods: Between 1994 and 2004, 81 patients with mild-to-moderate AS at the time of CABG underwent subsequent AVR. The mean EuroScore was 10.8 ± 1.8. The population was divided into three subgroups according to the time interval between AVR and CABG: group A, <5 years (n = 23); group B, 5-10 years (n = 34); and group C, >10 years (n = 24).
Results: Mean age at the time of CABG was 70 ± 5, 64 ± 6 and 58 ± 5 years in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The peak transvalvular gradient was £30 mmHg in 65 patients (80.2%), and 30-50 mmHg in 16 (19.7%). Operative mortality after AVR was 16% in the

overall population (30%, 11.7%, and 8.6% in groups A, B, and C, respectively). The mean time interval between CABG and AVR was 8.9 ± 5.2 years. By multivariate analysis, a peak transvalvular gradient ≥30 mmHg (p = 0.003), moderate calcifications with moderately-to-severely limited valve motion (p = 0.05), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (p = 0.005) were independent predictors of AVR within five years of CABG surgery. Systemic vascular atherosclerotic disease was a predictor of rapid disease progression by univariate analysis, and a predictor of operative mortality by multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Because of the high mortality associated with repeat operations within five years, AVR should be considered at the time of CABG in patients aged £75 years, with a peak transvalvular gradient >30 mmHg, moderately prominent calcifications with moderately to severely limited valve motion, and LVH.

The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2006;15:474-478

 
Untitled Document
Registered Users
Click here to view the file in pdf format or click here to logout from the site

Subscribers

You must be a subscriber and registered with the site to view these files. If you are a subscriber but have not yet registered with the site please click here.


Not yet subscribed?
Click here to subscribe using our simple online system