Periprocedural
Bridging Therapy with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Chronically Anticoagulated
Patients with Prosthetic Mechanical Heart Valves: Experience in 116 Patients
from the Prospective BRAVE Registry
Christoph Hammerstingl, Christian Tripp, Harald Schmidt, Giso von
der Recke, Heyder Omran
St. Marien Hospital Bonn-Venusberg, Bonn,
Germany |
Background and aim of the study: The study aim was to
determine the safety and feasibility of a standardized bridging regimen
in patients with mechanical heart valves at high thromboembolic risk,
using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
Methods: Since the year 2000, all patients at the authors’ institution,
with mechanical heart valves and a need for periprocedural interruption
of oral anticoagulation (OAC), were prospectively enrolled in this registry.
Patients were treated with enoxaparin following a pre-specified, standardized
bridging regimen. The main outcome measures were the incidence of hemorrhagic
or thromboembolic events. The follow up period was 30 days after hospital
discharge.
Results: A total of 116 patients was included (31 with mitral valve replacement,
76 aortic valve replacement, nine double valve replacement). Patients underwent
either major surgery (n = 25), minor surgery (n = 36), pacemaker implantation
(n = 21), or coronary catheterization (n = 34). |
Bridging therapy with enoxaparin was administered for
a mean of 7.0 ± 4.6 days. Eighteen patients (15.5%) were treated
as outpatients. In 35 patients (34%) with renal impairment (creatinine
clearance <50 ml/min), LMWH dosage was halved. No thromboembolic (95%
CI 0-3.1%) and only one major bleeding complication occurred (0.86%;
95% CI 0.02-4.7%); minor bleeding occurred in 10 patients (8.6%; 95%
CI 4.2-15.3%). The hemorrhages arose after a mean of 5.4 ± 1.4
days LMWH therapy.
Conclusion: Bridging therapy following a standardized LMWH-based regimen
with enoxaparin was effective and relatively safe in a large cohort of
patients with mechanical heart valves. Extended duration of LMWH therapy
seems to promote the incidence of hemorrhage. Neither dose reduction in
patients with renal impairment nor outpatient treatment affected the safety
and efficacy of this bridging regimen. These findings warrant that more
extensive studies be conducted to investigate the safety of this approach.
The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2007;16:285-292 |