Dimensional Ratios of Normal Mitral Valve Structures: A Tool for Determining the Degree of Geometric Distortion in Individual Patients Corrine L. Kegel1,2, Thomas M. Joudinaud1, Khee Hiang Lim1, Wolfgang
A. Goetz1, Emmanuel Lansac1, Patricia A. Weber1, Kumar Ganesan2, Carlos
M. G. Duran1 |
|||||||
Background and aim of the study: One objective of mitral
valve repair is to restore the distorted mitral apparatus geometry to
its normal dimensions specific for each patient. Because all dimensions
of the normal aortic and mitral valves should be related, it was hypothesized
that, in the presence of a normal aortic annulus, it would be possible
to determine the dimensions of the structures needed for mitral valve
repair. |
0.99 ± 0.19, and minimum length 0.94 ± 0.21.
The intertrigonal distance (T1-T2)
expanded by 4.19 ± 3.81%, and the transverse diameter (P1-P2)
contracted by -6.15 ± 3.69% from ED to ES. The interpapillary
muscle distance (M1-M2) contracted -22.3 ± 6.5%. The two distances
with the least amount of contraction were those of T1-M1 and T2-M2, with
contractions of -3.06 ± 2.39% and -3.27 ± 1.37%, respectively.
P1-M1 and P2-M2 expanded 5.60 ± 2.89% and 6.84 ± 3.60%
from ED to ES. |
||||||
|
|||||||