The Journal of Heart Valve Disease
Volume 13 Supplement May 2004
CONTENTS
SESSION I: SEARCHING FOR A CORRECT METHOD OF EVALUATION FOR VALVE PROSTHESIS PERFORMANCE |
|
|
Laboratory Assessment |
S 1 |
| Animal
Trials for Heart Valve Substitutes |
S 4 |
| Should
Valve Evaluation be Undertaken in Different Populations from Different
Countries? |
S 7 |
| Clinical
Evaluation: Statistical Considerations and How to Meet Them in Clinical
Practice |
S 11 |
| The
Role of the ISS in the Italian Health Service, and the Need for Medical
Device Market Surveillance |
S 14 |
| What
is the Minimal Follow Up Period to be Considered Significant when Evaluating
a Valve Prosthesis Model? Should ‘Actual’ and ‘Actuarial’
Curves be Considered always Essential for any Scientific Presentation? |
S 18 |
| Should
‘Actual’ and ‘Actuarial’ Curves be Considered
always Essential for any Scientific Presentation ? |
S 20 |
SESSION II: THE PAST AND THE FUTURE OF MECHANICAL VALVE PROSTHESES |
|
|
27-Year Follow Up of the Starr-Edwards Prosthesis Implanted in the Mitral
Position: An Analysis of Survival and Valve-Related Complications |
S 21 |
| Long-Term
Results of Mechanical Valve Replacement: Isolated Mitral Valve Replacement
and Mitral-Aortic Valve Replacement |
S 26 |
| Tilting-disc
versus Bileaflet Mechanical Prostheses in the Aortic Position: A Multicenter
Evaluation |
S 27 |
| Mid-Term
Clinical and Hemodynamic Evaluation of 19 mm Sorin Bicarbon Aortic Valve
Prostheses |
S 35 |
| Mechanical
Valve Thrombosis: A Tailored Approach for a Multiplex Disease |
S 37 |
| The
Past and the Future of Mechanical Valve Prostheses |
S 43 |
SESSION III: BIOLOGICAL VALVES |
|
|
The Experience with Porcine Bioprostheses at Padua University |
S 44 |
| Long-Term
Outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve Prosthesis in the
Aortic Position: Effect of Patient Age |
S 49 |
| Homografts
and Autografts: Which Patients Really Benefit? |
S 52 |
SESSION IV: HEMODYNAMICS: VALVULAR GRADIENTS AND VENTRICULAR REMODELING |
|
| Left
Ventricular Mass Regression after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic
Stenosis: Time Course and Determinants |
S 55 |
| The
Concept of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch |
S 59 |
| Influence
of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch on Myocardial Mass Regression and Clinical
Outcome in Physically Active Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement |
S 63 |
| Left
Ventricular Mass Regression after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic
Stenosis with Newly Designed 17-mm Bileaflet Prostheses |
S 68 |
| Left
Ventricle Remodeling after Aortic Valve Replacement with a Stentless Bioprosthesis |
S 69 |
| Elucidation
of Cardiac Physiology in Aortic Valve Replacement: What Should We Know? |
S 70 |
| SESSION V: ANTICOAGULATION |
|
|
State of the Art Anticoagulation Management |
S 76 |
| Mitral
Valve Replacement and Thromboembolic Risk |
S 81 |
| Valvular
Replacement in a Pediatric Population: An Italian Multicenter Study |
S 84 |
| Low-Dose
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses: The
Italian Experience |
S 86 |
| Incidence
of Anticoagulation in Patients with Bioprostheses |
S 88 |
| Risk
of Warfarin Anticoagulation in Pregnant Patients with Mechanical Heart
Valve Prostheses |
S 90 |
SESSION VI: LIFE QUALITY AND EXPECTANCY AFTER HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT |
|
| The
‘Threshold Age’ in Choosing Biological Versus Mechanical Prostheses
in Western Countries |
S 91 |
| Searching
for the Truth: A Mechanical or a Tissue Valve? | S 95 |