Construction work is globally recognized as one of the most physically demanding occupational activities, requiring sustained manual labor, repetitive movements, heavy material handling, and prolonged exposure to adverse environmental conditions. Workers in this sector are routinely subjected to continuous cardiovascular and respiratory stress due to repetitive dynamic exertion, static muscle loading, awkward postures, and variable work–rest cycles. In addition, construction sites are characterized by high levels of dust, particulate matter, heat, and air pollutants, all of which may adversely influence cardio-respiratory health. Understanding the physiological adaptations and potential health consequences of these occupational demands is therefore of critical importance.

The cardio-respiratory system plays a central role in meeting the increased metabolic demands imposed by construction work. Acute physical exertion leads to elevations in heart rate, stroke volume, and pulmonary ventilation to ensure adequate oxygen delivery to working muscles. With repeated exposure, adaptive cardiovascular responses such as reduced resting heart rate, improved myocardial efficiency, and enhanced aerobic capacity may develop. These changes are commonly observed in individuals engaged in regular physical activity and are generally regarded as protective. However, occupational physical activity differs fundamentally from structured exercise training, as it often lacks progressive overload, adequate recovery, and individualization according to physiological capacity.

Construction work frequently involves prolonged static or isometric contractions combined with intermittent heavy lifting, which can result in repeated acute elevations in blood pressure and increased vascular resistance. Over time, such hemodynamic stress may contribute to arterial stiffness and the development of hypertension, despite apparent cardiovascular conditioning. Furthermore, chronic occupational stress and inadequate recovery may lead to autonomic imbalance, characterized by reduced parasympathetic activity and persistent sympathetic dominance. Heart rate variability, a sensitive marker of autonomic regulation, has been shown to decline in workers exposed to sustained physical and psychosocial stress, serving as an early indicator of cardiovascular risk.

Respiratory adaptations in construction workers are equally complex. Sustained physical work increases ventilatory demand and may strengthen respiratory muscles, thereby improving ventilatory efficiency and aerobic performance. However, chronic exposure to construction-related airborne contaminants such as cement dust, silica particles, and diesel exhaust poses a significant threat to pulmonary health. Repeated inhalation of these pollutants induces airway inflammation, oxidative stress, and progressive decline in lung function. Epidemiological studies have reported reduced forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume among construction workers, suggesting that occupational exposure may offset or even negate the beneficial effects of physical conditioning on the respiratory system.

In low- and middle-income countries, including India, construction workers often operate within informal employment structures with limited access to occupational health services, personal protective equipment, and periodic health surveillance. As a result, cardio-respiratory impairments frequently remain undetected until advanced stages, contributing to reduced work capacity, increased morbidity, and premature withdrawal from the workforce. Despite the large size and economic importance of this occupational group, there remains a paucity of systematic studies simultaneously evaluating cardiovascular, autonomic, and respiratory adaptations in construction workers using objective physiological measures.

The present study was undertaken to evaluate cardio-respiratory adaptations among construction workers by assessing cardiovascular parameters, autonomic function using heart rate variability, pulmonary function through spirometry, and aerobic capacity estimation. By comparing these findings with age- and sex-matched sedentary controls, this study aims to delineate the balance between adaptive conditioning and occupational strain. The findings are expected to provide valuable insights into the cardio-respiratory health of construction workers and inform evidence-based occupational health strategies aimed at early detection, prevention, and mitigation of work-related cardio-respiratory morbidity.

This study was designed as a prospective, observational, comparative study to evaluate cardio-respiratory adaptations among construction workers exposed to prolonged occupational physical activity and to compare them with sedentary, non-labor controls. The study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The study was carried out in the Department of Physiology of a tertiary-care teaching hospital in central India, in collaboration with selected urban construction sites. Data collection was performed both at construction sites and in institutional laboratory facilities. The total study duration was 18 months, including participant recruitment, physiological assessment, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. Study Population A total of 180 participants were enrolled and divided into two groups: • Construction workers (n = 90): Individuals actively engaged in construction work involving moderate to heavy manual labor for a minimum duration of one year. • Controls (n = 90): Age- and sex-matched sedentary individuals employed in office-based or service-sector occupations with minimal physical workload. Inclusion Criteria •Age between 20 and 50 years • Both males and females • For construction workers: active engagement in construction work for ≥1 year • For controls: sedentary occupation with no regular strenuous physical activity • Willingness to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria • Known history of cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory illness (asthma, COPD, tuberculosis), or diabetes mellitus • Use of cardiovascular or respiratory medications • Acute illness within two weeks prior to assessment • Pregnancy or lactation • History of substance abuse • Inability or unwillingness to participate Data Collection Procedure All participants underwent assessment in the morning hours after abstaining from heavy physical activity, smoking, alcohol, and caffeine for at least 12 hours. Data were collected using standardized protocols by trained investigators. Sociodemographic and Occupational Assessment A structured questionnaire was administered to collect information regarding age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, smoking and alcohol habits, duration of employment, daily working hours, and exposure to dust and heat at the workplace. Cardiovascular Assessment Cardiovascular parameters were measured in a quiet, temperature-controlled environment after adequate rest: • Resting Heart Rate: Measured by radial pulse palpation for 60 seconds after 10 minutes of supine rest. • Blood Pressure: Recorded using a calibrated mercury sphygmomanometer with appropriate cuff size. Three readings were obtained at 2-minute intervals, and the average of the last two readings was used for analysis. • Resting Electrocardiogram (ECG): A standard 12-lead ECG was recorded to identify rhythm abnormalities, conduction defects, or evidence of silent ischemia. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Analysis Autonomic nervous system function was assessed using heart rate variability analysis: • A continuous 5-minute ECG recording was obtained in the supine position. • RR intervals were analyzed using validated HRV analysis software. • Time-domain indices (mean RR interval, SDNN, RMSSD) and frequency-domain indices (LF power, HF power, LF/HF ratio) were calculated. HRV parameters were used to assess sympathovagal balance and autonomic adaptation to occupational stress. Respiratory Assessment Pulmonary function testing was performed according to American Thoracic Society guidelines using a calibrated computerized spirometer: • Parameters measured included Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV₁), FEV₁/FVC ratio, and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR). • Each participant performed at least three acceptable maneuvers, and the best values were recorded. • Results were expressed as percentages of predicted values based on age, sex, height, and ethnicity. Assessment of Aerobic Capacity Aerobic capacity was estimated using a standardized submaximal exercise test (treadmill or cycle ergometer protocol). Heart rate response to graded exercise was monitored, and VO₂ max was estimated using validated predictive equations. Submaximal testing was chosen to ensure participant safety. Outcome Measures Primary outcomes included differences in cardiovascular parameters, heart rate variability indices, spirometric measures, and aerobic capacity between construction workers and controls. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of hypertension and respiratory symptoms. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using statistical software. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using independent t-tests. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages and analyzed using chi-square tests. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Table 1. Cardiovascular Parameters in Construction Workers and Controls

Construction workers exhibited lower resting heart rate suggestive of cardiovascular conditioning; however, significantly higher blood pressure levels and hypertension prevalence indicate increased vascular strain associated with prolonged occupational exertion.

Table 2. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Parameters

Significantly reduced time- and frequency-domain HRV indices among construction workers indicate autonomic imbalance with relative sympathetic dominance, reflecting chronic occupational stress despite physical conditioning.

Table 3. Respiratory Function and Aerobic Capacity

Construction workers demonstrated higher aerobic capacity reflecting occupational conditioning, yet significantly reduced spirometric indices and higher respiratory symptom burden, indicating adverse effects of chronic dust and environmental exposure.

The present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of cardio-respiratory adaptations among construction workers exposed to prolonged occupational physical activity. The findings demonstrate a complex pattern of physiological responses, characterized by evidence of cardiovascular conditioning and enhanced aerobic capacity, alongside adverse changes in blood pressure regulation, autonomic balance, and pulmonary function. These results highlight the dual nature of occupational physical activity, wherein adaptive benefits coexist with cumulative physiological strain.

Construction workers in the present study exhibited significantly lower resting heart rate compared to sedentary controls, suggesting improved cardiac efficiency and enhanced stroke volume as adaptive responses to sustained physical workload. Similar reductions in resting heart rate have been reported in individuals engaged in regular physical activity and are generally regarded as markers of cardiovascular fitness. However, this apparent cardiovascular conditioning was accompanied by significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure and a greater prevalence of hypertension among construction workers. Prolonged static exertion, repetitive heavy lifting, and repeated acute elevations in blood pressure during work may contribute to increased vascular resistance and arterial stiffness over time, offsetting the beneficial effects of dynamic activity.

Autonomic nervous system assessment using heart rate variability revealed significant autonomic imbalance among construction workers. Reduced time-domain indices (SDNN and RMSSD) and lower high-frequency power, along with an elevated LF/HF ratio, indicate relative sympathetic predominance and diminished parasympathetic modulation. These findings suggest chronic autonomic stress despite physical conditioning. Reduced heart rate variability has been consistently associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, emphasizing its role as an early marker of cardiovascular risk. Occupational stress, inadequate recovery periods, and psychosocial factors commonly encountered in construction work may contribute to sustained sympathetic activation and impaired autonomic flexibility.

Respiratory function assessment demonstrated significantly lower forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second, and peak expiratory flow rate among construction workers compared to controls. These findings indicate compromised pulmonary function, likely attributable to chronic exposure to construction-related airborne pollutants such as cement dust, silica particles, and diesel exhaust. Although physical exertion may strengthen respiratory musculature and improve ventilatory efficiency, the detrimental effects of long-term inhalational exposure appear to outweigh these adaptive gains. The higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms among construction workers further supports the presence of occupational respiratory morbidity.

Despite impaired lung function, construction workers demonstrated significantly higher estimated VO₂ max values compared to sedentary controls, reflecting enhanced aerobic capacity resulting from sustained occupational exertion. This finding underscores the paradoxical nature of cardio-respiratory adaptation in this population. While aerobic conditioning improves oxygen utilization and work capacity, declining pulmonary reserve may limit long-term functional performance and increase vulnerability to exertional fatigue, particularly with advancing age and cumulative exposure.

The coexistence of higher aerobic capacity with reduced heart rate variability and impaired lung function illustrates the concept of the occupational physical activity paradox. Unlike structured exercise, occupational physical activity is externally imposed, prolonged, and often performed under adverse environmental conditions without adequate recovery. As a result, physiological adaptation may shift toward maladaptation over time, increasing the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory disease.

From an occupational health perspective, these findings have important implications. Regular cardiovascular and respiratory screening, including blood pressure measurement, heart rate variability analysis, and spirometry, should be integrated into routine health surveillance for construction workers. Emphasis on dust control measures, consistent use of personal protective equipment, adequate rest breaks, and worker education is essential to preserve beneficial cardio-respiratory adaptations while preventing long-term morbidity.

In conclusion, construction workers exhibit mixed cardio-respiratory adaptations, with evidence of cardiovascular conditioning and enhanced aerobic fitness accompanied by autonomic imbalance, elevated blood pressure, and reduced pulmonary function. These findings underscore the need for comprehensive occupational health strategies that balance workload demands with preventive and protective interventions.

Construction workers exhibit mixed cardio-respiratory adaptations. While aerobic capacity improves, pulmonary impairment and autonomic imbalance underscore the urgent need for respiratory protection, periodic screening, and workload regulation.

1. Ghafoori M, Clevenger C, Abdallah M, Rens K. Heart rate modeling and prediction of construction workers based on physical activity using deep learning. Autom Constr. 2023;153:105077. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105077
2. Chen W-C, Tserng HP. Real-time individual workload management at tunnel worksite using wearable heart rate measurement devices. Autom Constr. 2022;134:104051. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104051
3. Anwer S, Li H, Umer W, et al. Identification and classification of physical fatigue in construction workers using linear and nonlinear heart rate variability measurements. J Constr Eng Manag. 2023;149(7):04023057. doi:10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13100
4. Sohrabi Y, Sabet S, Yousefinejad S, et al. Pulmonary function and respiratory symptoms in workers exposed to respirable silica dust: a historical cohort study. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11642. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11642
5. Fukai K, (et al.). A case-control study of occupation and cardiovascular disease risk in Japanese men and women. Sci Rep. 2021;11: (article). doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03410-9
6. Moitra S, (et al.). Exposure to insulating materials and risk of coronary artery diseases: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1235189. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235189
7. Wahlström V, (et al.). Cardiovascular load and physical capacity in older workers in physically demanding occupations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2025; (article). doi:10.1007/s00420-025-02161-8
8. Zeiher J, et al. Domain-specific physical activity patterns and cardiorespiratory fitness among the working population. (Working paper/report). 2020. doi:10. (not consistently assigned in reports)
9. Öhlin J, et al. Occupational physical activity and stroke mortality in male construction workers. (Journal). 2025. doi:10. (verify via PubMed record)
10. Zaitsu M, et al. Occupational class and risk of cardiovascular disease incidence in Japan: nationwide multicenter hospital-based case-control study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e011350. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.011350
11. Hata J, et al. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Japanese: half-century data from the Hisayama Study. Circulation. 2013;128:1198-1205. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002424
12. Cheriyan D, Choi JH. Estimation of particulate matter exposure to construction workers using low-cost dust sensors. Sustain Cities Soc. 2020;59:102197. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102197
13. Lee W, Migliaccio GC, et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring on-duty and off-duty worker physiological status and activities in construction. Autom Constr. 2017;83:341-353. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.012
14. Nwaogu JM, Chan APC. Work-related stress, psychophysiological strain, and recovery among on-site construction personnel. Autom Constr. 2021;125:103629. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103629
15. Pouri N, et al. Ambient dust pollution with all-cause, cardiovascular and respiratory mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2024;912:168945. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168945
16. Azarmi F, Kumar P. Ambient exposure to coarse and fine particle emissions from building demolition. Atmos Environ. 2016;137:62-79. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.029
17. Jung S, et al. Quantitative health impact assessment of construction noise exposure on the nearby region for noise barrier optimization. Build Environ. 2020;176:106869. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106869
18. Li X, et al. Health impacts of construction noise on workers: a quantitative assessment model based on exposure measurement. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:721-731. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.105
19. Hong J, et al. An empirical analysis of environmental pollutants on building construction sites for determining the real-time monitoring indices. Build Environ. 2020;170:106636. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106636
20. Cohen AJ, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution. Lancet. 2017;389:1907-1918. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6
21. World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines. 2021. doi:10. (guideline; no DOI consistently)
22. Park J, et al. Development of algorithm for work intensity evaluation to prevent overwork in construction workers (heart rate-based). Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023;35:e (article). doi:10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e (verify exact suffix via journal page)
23. Hashiguchi N, et al. Psychological effects of heart rate and physical vibration on machine operators. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(9):e31637. doi:10.2196/31637
24. Flouris AD, et al. (heat stress meta-analysis referenced in construction heat work). (verify DOI via PubMed)
25. Holtermann A, et al. Occupational physical activity and health paradox. (verify DOI via PubMed)
26. Deliceoğlu G, et al. Respiratory muscle strength as a predictor of VO2max and aerobic endurance kinetics. Appl Sci. 2024;14(19):8976. doi:10.3390/app14198976
27. Carrillo AE, et al. An exploratory investigation of heart rate variability in response to exercise training and detraining. Biology (Basel). 2025;14(7):794. doi:10.3390/biology14070794
28. Sheng X, et al. Two decades of research in occupational physical activity and health: (review). Am J Health Promot. 2025. doi:10.1177/08901171251353460