Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
61 Views
20 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 31 Issue 3 (April-May-June, 2026) | Pages 19 - 26
Evaluation of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
1
M.B.Ch.B, F.I.C.M.S (Med.), F.I.C.M.S ( Cardio), C.A.B.M (Cardio). Al-Rusafa Health Directorate. Department of Interventional Cardiology, Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital.
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
April 8, 2026
Revised
April 29, 2026
Accepted
May 1, 2026
Published
May 18, 2026
Abstract

Background: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is considered the preferred reperfusion strategy because it rapidly restores coronary blood flow, reduces infarct size, and improves survival outcomes. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, angiographic, and in-hospital outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Patients and Methods: This observational prospective study was conducted at Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital from 1st October 2023 to 30th March 2026. A total of 160 patients diagnosed with acute STEMI and treated with PPCI were enrolled. Demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic findings, reperfusion parameters, echocardiographic findings, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital complications were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Males represented 73.8% of the study population, and the mean age was 59.8 ± 11.6 years. Smoking was the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor (57.5%), followed by hypertension (52.5%) and diabetes mellitus (41.3%). Anterior STEMI was the most common infarct location (43.8%), while Killip class I represented 71.9% of cases. The left anterior descending artery was the most frequent culprit vessel (45.0%). Radial access was used in 86.3% of procedures. Successful reperfusion with TIMI III flow was achieved in 88.8% of patients. The mean door-to-balloon time was 94.5 ± 28.4 minutes. Heart failure was the most common in-hospital complication (15.0%), followed by arrhythmias (12.5%) and cardiogenic shock (8.1%). In-hospital mortality occurred in 6.9% of patients. TIMI III flow and shorter door-to-balloon time were significantly associated with lower mortality and fewer complications (p<0.05). Conclusion: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is an effective and safe reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients, achieving high procedural success and acceptable in-hospital outcomes. Early reperfusion, shorter door-to-balloon time, radial access utilization, and successful restoration of TIMI III flow remain important predictors of improved prognosis and reduced mortality.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide despite major advances in preventive cardiology and reperfusion therapy. STEMI is characterized by acute coronary artery occlusion resulting from plaque rupture and thrombus formation, leading to prolonged myocardial ischemia and irreversible myocardial necrosis if prompt reperfusion is not achieved. Early restoration of coronary blood flow is therefore the cornerstone of management in order to preserve myocardial function, reduce infarct size, improve survival, and minimize complications such as heart failure, arrhythmias, and cardiogenic shock.⁽¹⁻³⁾ Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is currently considered the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with acute STEMI when it can be performed within the recommended time limits by experienced interventional cardiology teams. PPCI has demonstrated superiority over fibrinolytic therapy in reducing mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, reinfarction, and intracranial hemorrhage.⁽⁴⁻⁶⁾ International guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) strongly recommend PPCI as the first-line reperfusion modality when available within 120 minutes of first medical contact.⁽⁷,⁸⁾ Several factors influence the clinical outcomes of PPCI in STEMI patients, including total ischemic time, door-to-balloon time, operator experience, infarct location, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, comorbidities, and the extent of coronary artery disease. Delays in reperfusion are associated with increased myocardial damage and worse prognosis.⁽⁹⁾ Consequently, rapid diagnosis and timely transfer to catheterization-capable centers are essential components of STEMI management systems. Recent advances in interventional cardiology, including improved stent technology, radial arterial access, adjunctive antiplatelet therapy, intravascular imaging, and optimized pharmacological management, have significantly enhanced procedural success rates and patient survival following PPCI.⁽¹⁰⁾ Nevertheless, adverse in-hospital outcomes such as heart failure, arrhythmias, bleeding complications, no-reflow phenomenon, and mortality remain important clinical concerns, particularly in developing countries where delays in presentation and limited healthcare resources may negatively affect outcomes.⁽¹¹⁾ Several international registries and observational studies have evaluated the outcomes of PPCI in STEMI patients and reported variable rates of successful reperfusion and in-hospital mortality depending on healthcare infrastructure and patient characteristics. Takamizawa et al. demonstrated that PPCI performed even by less experienced operators under expert supervision resulted in acceptable long-term cardiovascular outcomes.⁽¹²⁾ Likewise, Chacón-Diaz et al. reported that timely reperfusion significantly influenced clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing invasive reperfusion strategies.⁽¹¹⁾ In Iraq, limited local data are available regarding the real-world outcomes of PPCI among STEMI patients. Therefore, evaluating procedural success, complications, and short-term clinical outcomes is important for assessing the quality of interventional cardiac services and identifying areas requiring improvement. Accordingly, the present study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated at Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting This observational prospective study was conducted at the Department of Interventional Cardiology in Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital over a period extending from 1st October 2023 to 30th March 2026. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and procedural outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Study Population A total of 160 patients diagnosed with acute STEMI and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled in the study. All patients were admitted through the emergency department or coronary care unit and underwent urgent coronary angiography followed by PPCI according to current international guidelines. Inclusion Criteria The study included patients who fulfilled the following criteria: 1. Adult patients aged 18 years or older. 2. Diagnosis of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction based on clinical presentation, electrocardiographic findings, and cardiac biomarker elevation according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. 3. Patients presenting within 12 hours from symptom onset. 4. Patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention as the initial reperfusion strategy. Exclusion Criteria Patients were excluded from the study if they had any of the following: 1. Patients treated with thrombolytic therapy before coronary intervention. 2. Patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina. 3. Patients with incomplete clinical or procedural data. 4. Patients who refused participation in the study. Data Collection Data were collected using a specially designed case sheet through direct patient interviews, clinical examination, hospital records, laboratory investigations, electrocardiography, echocardiography, and coronary angiography reports. The collected variables included: • Demographic characteristics including age and sex. • Cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidemia, and family history of coronary artery disease. • Clinical presentation and symptom onset time. • Killip classification on admission. • Electrocardiographic findings and infarct location. • Laboratory investigations including cardiac troponin levels and routine biochemical parameters. • Angiographic findings including culprit vessel, number of diseased vessels, TIMI flow before and after intervention, and stent implantation. • Procedural characteristics including vascular access site and door-to-balloon time. • In-hospital outcomes and complications including arrhythmias, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, bleeding complications, reinfarction, stroke, and mortality. Outcome Measures The primary outcome measures included procedural success and in-hospital mortality. Procedural success was defined as restoration of TIMI grade III coronary flow in the infarct-related artery after PCI with residual stenosis less than 20%. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications such as heart failure, cardiogenic shock, arrhythmias, major bleeding, and length of hospital stay. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between variables were performed using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Ethical Considerations The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the scientific and ethical committee of Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital prior to study initiation. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment in the study.

RESULTS

The study showed that males constituted the majority of the patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, accounting for 118 (73.8%) cases, while females represented 42 (26.2%) cases. The mean age of the study population was 59.8 ± 11.6 years. Patients aged 50–69 years represented the largest proportion of cases (61.3%). No statistically significant difference was observed between age categories and gender distribution (p=0.412).

 

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Patients with Acute STEMI Undergoing PPCI

Variables

Frequency (n=160)

Percentage (%)

Age Groups (years)

   

<40

14

8.8

40–49

31

19.4

50–59

49

30.6

60–69

49

30.6

≥70

17

10.6

Mean ± SD

59.8 ± 11.6

Gender

   

Male

118

73.8

Female

42

26.2

 

The study showed that smoking was the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor among STEMI patients, reported in 92 (57.5%) patients, followed by hypertension in 84 (52.5%) and diabetes mellitus in 66 (41.3%) patients. Dyslipidemia was identified in 58 (36.3%) cases. A statistically significant association was observed between smoking and male gender (p<0.001).

 

The study showed that anterior wall myocardial infarction represented the most common infarct location in 70 (43.8%) patients, followed by inferior wall myocardial infarction in 56 (35.0%) patients. Most patients presented with Killip class I (71.9%), while cardiogenic shock (Killip IV) was observed in 8.1% of cases. A statistically significant relationship was observed between higher Killip class and in-hospital complications (p=0.002).

 

Table 2: Distribution of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among STEMI Patients

Risk Factors

Frequency

Percentage (%)

p-value

Smoking

92

57.5

<0.001

Hypertension

84

52.5

0.021

Diabetes Mellitus

66

41.3

0.038

Dyslipidemia

58

36.3

0.047

Family history of CAD

39

24.4

0.114

Previous ischemic heart disease

33

20.6

0.089

 

Table 3: Clinical Presentation and Killip Classification of STEMI Patients

Variables

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Infarct Location

   

Anterior STEMI

70

43.8

Inferior STEMI

56

35.0

Lateral STEMI

18

11.2

Extensive anterior STEMI

10

6.3

Posterior STEMI

6

3.7

Killip Classification

   

Killip I

115

71.9

Killip II

24

15.0

Killip III

8

5.0

Killip IV

13

8.1

 

The study showed that the left anterior descending artery was the most frequently affected culprit vessel in 72 (45.0%) patients. Radial access was used in 138 (86.3%) procedures, whereas femoral access was used in 22 (13.7%) procedures. Successful reperfusion with final TIMI III flow was achieved in 142 (88.8%) patients. The mean door-to-balloon time was 94.5 ± 28.4 minutes. TIMI III flow was significantly associated with lower mortality and fewer complications (p=0.001).

 

Table 4: Angiographic and Procedural Findings of PPCI

Variables

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Culprit Vessel

   

LAD

72

45.0

RCA

58

36.3

LCX

21

13.1

Left Main

9

5.6

Vascular Access

   

Radial

138

86.3

Femoral

22

13.7

Final TIMI Flow

   

TIMI I

4

2.5

TIMI II

14

8.7

TIMI III

142

88.8

Mean Door-to-Balloon Time (minutes)

94.5 ± 28.4

 

The study showed that heart failure was the most common in-hospital complication occurring in 24 (15.0%) patients, followed by arrhythmias in 20 (12.5%) patients. Cardiogenic shock developed in 13 (8.1%) patients, while in-hospital mortality occurred in 11 (6.9%) cases. Major bleeding complications were uncommon and reported in only 5 (3.1%) patients. A statistically significant association was found between prolonged door-to-balloon time and increased mortality (p=0.003).

 

The study showed that the mean symptom onset-to-first medical contact time was 118.6 ± 54.2 minutes, while the mean door-to-balloon time was 94.5 ± 28.4 minutes. Patients with door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes demonstrated significantly lower rates of cardiogenic shock and mortality compared with those with prolonged reperfusion times (p=0.001).

 

4.7. Echocardiographic Findings Following PPCI

The study showed that preserved left ventricular systolic function (LVEF ≥50%) was observed in 63 (39.4%) patients, while moderately reduced ejection fraction (40–49%) was found in 58 (36.3%) patients. Severely reduced ejection fraction (<40%) was identified in 39 (24.3%) patients and was significantly associated with higher in-hospital complications and mortality (p=0.002).

Table 6: Time-to-Reperfusion Characteristics Among STEMI Patients Undergoing PPCI

Variables

Mean ± SD / Frequency

Percentage (%)

p-value

Symptom onset to first medical contact (minutes)

118.6 ± 54.2

0.014

Door-to-balloon time (minutes)

94.5 ± 28.4

0.001

Total ischemic time (minutes)

212.4 ± 73.8

0.003

Door-to-balloon ≤90 minutes

92

57.5

0.001

Door-to-balloon >90 minutes

68

42.5

0.001

 

Table 5: In-Hospital Outcomes and Complications Following PPCI

Outcomes and Complications

Frequency

Percentage (%)

p-value

Heart failure

24

15.0

0.011

Arrhythmias

20

12.5

0.024

Cardiogenic shock

13

8.1

0.002

Reinfarction

6

3.8

0.081

Stroke

3

1.9

0.119

Major bleeding

5

3.1

0.067

In-hospital mortality

11

6.9

0.003

 

Table 7: Echocardiographic Findings Among STEMI Patients After PPCI

Echocardiographic Variables

Frequency

Percentage (%)

p-value

LVEF ≥50%

63

39.4

0.021

LVEF 40–49%

58

36.3

0.017

LVEF <40%

39

24.3

0.002

Anterior wall hypokinesia

74

46.3

0.013

Inferior wall hypokinesia

52

32.5

0.041

Mitral regurgitation

19

11.9

0.038

Left ventricular thrombus

6

3.8

0.049

 

The study showed that patients with left anterior descending artery involvement had significantly higher rates of heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction compared with other culprit vessels (p=0.004). Mortality was also more frequent among patients with left main coronary artery disease.

 

Table 8: Association Between Culprit Vessel and In-Hospital Outcomes

Culprit Vessel

Heart Failure n (%)

Cardiogenic Shock n (%)

Mortality n (%)

p-value

LAD (n=72)

16 (22.2)

8 (11.1)

6 (8.3)

0.004

RCA (n=58)

5 (8.6)

3 (5.2)

3 (5.2)

0.039

LCX (n=21)

2 (9.5)

1 (4.8)

1 (4.8)

0.072

Left Main (n=9)

1 (11.1)

1 (11.1)

1 (11.1)

0.031

 

The study showed that achievement of TIMI III flow after PPCI was associated with significantly lower rates of heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and mortality compared with TIMI I–II flow (p<0.001).

 

Table 9: Relationship Between Final TIMI Flow and In-Hospital Outcomes

Outcomes

TIMI I–II (n=18)

TIMI III (n=142)

p-value

Heart failure

9 (50.0%)

15 (10.6%)

<0.001

Cardiogenic shock

5 (27.8%)

8 (5.6%)

<0.001

Arrhythmias

6 (33.3%)

14 (9.9%)

0.002

Mortality

5 (27.8%)

6 (4.2%)

<0.001

 

The study showed that most patients had hospital stays ranging from 4–7 days, accounting for 96 (60.0%) patients. Prolonged hospitalization (>7 days) was significantly associated with heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and reduced ejection fraction (p=0.002).

 

Table 10: Length of Hospital Stay Among STEMI Patients

Hospital Stay Duration

Frequency

Percentage (%)

p-value

≤3 days

22

13.8

0.081

4–7 days

96

60.0

0.014

>7 days

42

26.2

0.002

Mean hospital stay (days)

6.4 ± 2.7

 

The study showed that diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and reduced ejection fraction were significantly associated with increased in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients undergoing PPCI (p<0.05).

 

Table 11: Association Between Risk Factors and In-Hospital Mortality

Variables

Survivors (n=149)

Non-survivors (n=11)

p-value

Diabetes Mellitus

58 (38.9%)

8 (72.7%)

0.019

Hypertension

75 (50.3%)

9 (81.8%)

0.027

Smoking

82 (55.0%)

10 (90.9%)

0.011

LVEF <40%

30 (20.1%)

9 (81.8%)

<0.001

Door-to-balloon >90 min

58 (38.9%)

10 (90.9%)

0.001

 

The study showed that radial access was associated with higher procedural success and lower bleeding complications compared with femoral access, with statistically significant differences observed regarding bleeding events (p=0.018).

 

Table 12: Procedural Outcomes According to Vascular Access Site

Variables

Radial Access (n=138)

Femoral Access (n=22)

p-value

TIMI III flow

125 (90.6%)

17 (77.3%)

0.041

Major bleeding

2 (1.4%)

3 (13.6%)

0.018

Mortality

8 (5.8%)

3 (13.6%)

0.092

Mean hospital stay (days)

5.9 ± 2.1

8.1 ± 3.2

0.007

 

DISCUSSION

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is considered the gold standard reperfusion strategy for patients presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction because of its superior efficacy in restoring coronary blood flow, reducing infarct size, preserving ventricular function, and improving survival outcomes.⁽¹⁻³⁾ The present study evaluated demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, angiographic findings, procedural success, and in-hospital outcomes among STEMI patients treated with PPCI at Al-Kindi Teaching Hospital. The current study demonstrated that males represented the majority of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. This finding agrees with previous international and regional studies that reported male predominance among acute myocardial infarction patients.⁽⁴⁻⁷⁾ Men are generally more exposed to cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, occupational stress, and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, which contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease.⁽⁸⁾ The mean age of the studied population was approximately 60 years, which is comparable to findings reported by Takamizawa et al. and Klancik et al., where most STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were between 50 and 70 years old.⁽⁶,⁹⁾ Smoking was the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factor identified in the present study. Similar findings were reported by Chacón-Diaz et al. and Saeed and Faeq, who observed high smoking prevalence among STEMI patients treated with reperfusion therapy.⁽¹⁰,¹¹⁾ Smoking promotes endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory activation, oxidative stress, and platelet aggregation, thereby contributing significantly to coronary thrombosis and plaque instability.⁽¹²⁾ Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were also highly prevalent among the studied patients. This finding agrees with several previous studies that identified hypertension and diabetes as major contributors to coronary artery disease progression and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.⁽¹³⁻¹⁵⁾ Diabetes mellitus is particularly associated with diffuse coronary artery involvement, impaired microvascular perfusion, delayed myocardial recovery, and increased mortality following PPCI.⁽¹⁶⁾ Dyslipidemia was also frequently observed in the current study, further supporting the role of lipid abnormalities in the development and progression of coronary atherosclerosis.⁽¹⁷⁾ Anterior wall myocardial infarction represented the most common infarct location in the present study. Similar observations were reported by Okşen et al. and Huang et al., who demonstrated that anterior STEMI predominated among patients undergoing PPCI.⁽¹⁸,¹⁹⁾ Anterior STEMI is commonly caused by left anterior descending artery occlusion and is associated with larger infarct size, impaired left ventricular function, and increased complication rates.⁽²⁰⁾ Most patients in the current study presented with Killip class I, indicating relatively preserved hemodynamic stability at admission. However, higher Killip classification was significantly associated with increased in-hospital complications and mortality. Similar findings were reported by Amon et al. and Fang et al., who demonstrated that Killip classification remains a strong predictor of adverse outcomes after STEMI.⁽²¹,²²⁾ The angiographic findings of the current study showed that the left anterior descending artery was the most frequently affected culprit vessel. Similar results were reported by Shaaban et al. and Nozaki et al.⁽²³,²⁴⁾ LAD occlusion frequently results in extensive myocardial ischemia because this artery supplies a large portion of the left ventricle. This explains the significantly higher rates of heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction observed among patients with LAD involvement in the present study. Radial access was used in the majority of procedures in the current study. This reflects the increasing global preference for radial artery access because of its lower bleeding risk, reduced vascular complications, shorter hospitalization duration, and improved patient comfort.⁽²⁵⁾ The present study also demonstrated significantly lower bleeding complications among patients treated through radial access compared with femoral access. Similar findings were reported by Valgimigli et al., who confirmed the superiority of radial access in reducing major bleeding events and improving procedural safety in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI.⁽²²⁾

 

One of the most important findings of the present study was the high procedural success rate, with TIMI III flow achieved in 88.8% of patients. Comparable reperfusion success rates have been reported in several contemporary studies evaluating PPCI outcomes.⁽²³⁻²⁵⁾ Restoration of TIMI III flow is strongly associated with improved myocardial perfusion, preservation of ventricular function, and lower mortality rates.⁽²⁶⁾ In the current study, TIMI III flow was significantly associated with lower rates of heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and mortality. Similar findings were demonstrated by Ndrepepa et al., who reported that impaired postprocedural TIMI flow independently predicted poor cardiovascular outcomes following STEMI.⁽²⁵⁾ The mean door-to-balloon time observed in the present study was approximately 95 minutes, which is close to internationally recommended standards.⁽¹⁾ Patients with door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes demonstrated significantly lower rates of cardiogenic shock and mortality than those with prolonged reperfusion times. Similar findings were reported by Denktas et al. and Boersma et al., who emphasized that rapid reperfusion significantly improves myocardial salvage and survival outcomes following STEMI.⁽²⁶,²⁷⁾ Total ischemic time remains one of the most important determinants of prognosis because delayed reperfusion leads to irreversible myocardial necrosis and impaired ventricular recovery.⁽²⁸⁾ Heart failure represented the most common in-hospital complication in the present study. Similar findings were observed in contemporary STEMI registries evaluating PPCI outcomes.⁽¹⁹,²¹⁾ Heart failure after STEMI generally reflects extensive myocardial injury, delayed reperfusion, or impaired microvascular perfusion despite successful epicardial artery reopening. Arrhythmias were also common complications in the current study and may result from ischemia-related electrical instability and reperfusion injury.⁽²⁹⁾ Cardiogenic shock remained one of the most serious complications and was strongly associated with mortality, consistent with previous reports evaluating STEMI complicated by shock.⁽²⁴⁾ The in-hospital mortality rate in the present study was comparable to mortality rates reported in recent international PPCI registries.⁽⁶,⁷⁾ Mortality was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, prolonged door-to-balloon time, and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Similar predictors have been identified in previous studies evaluating short-term mortality following STEMI.⁽²¹,³⁰⁾ Reduced ejection fraction is widely recognized as one of the strongest prognostic indicators because it reflects extensive myocardial damage and impaired ventricular performance.⁽³⁰⁾ Echocardiographic findings in the current study demonstrated that nearly one-quarter of patients had severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Anterior wall hypokinesia represented the most common regional wall motion abnormality because of the predominance of LAD involvement. Similar findings were reported by Aldujeli et al. and Madsen et al. in studies evaluating ventricular remodeling and functional outcomes after STEMI.⁽²⁹,³⁰⁾ Patients with severely reduced ejection fraction experienced significantly higher mortality and prolonged hospitalization in the present study, emphasizing the prognostic importance of early ventricular function assessment after PPCI.

 

Overall, the findings of the present study confirm that PPCI is an effective and safe reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients in Iraqi clinical practice, with high procedural success rates and acceptable complication and mortality outcomes. Early reperfusion, achievement of TIMI III flow, radial access utilization, and minimization of door-to-balloon time remain essential determinants of improved prognosis after STEMI.

References
1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-177. 2. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e18-e114. 3. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018;138(20):e618-e651. 4. Savage ML, Hay K, Murdoch DJ, et al. Sex differences in time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2022;45(11):1120-1128. 5. Thrane PG, Olesen KKW, Thim T, et al. Mortality trends after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(14):1452-1463. 6. Takamizawa K, Gohbara M, Hanajima Y, Tsutsumi K, Kirigaya H, Kirigaya J, et al. Long-term outcomes and operators’ experience in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025;40(1):57-67. 7. Thrane PG, Olesen KKW, Thim T, et al. Mortality trends after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(12):1234-1245. 8. Saeed EN, Faeq AK. Impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: A comprehensive analysis. World J Exp Med. 2024;14(1):22-34. 9. Klancik V, Pesl L, Neuberg P, Tousek P, et al. Long-term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(Suppl 1):ehac544. 10. Okşen D, Sarılar M, Demirci G, Haberal İ. In-hospital and long-term outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Koşuyolu Heart J. 2022;25(2):44-52. 11. Chacón-Diaz M, Custodio-Sánchez P, Rojas De la Cuba P, Yábar-Galindo G, Rodríguez-Olivares R, Miranda-Noé D, et al. Outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention or pharmacoinvasive strategy in a Latin American country. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22:296. 12. Alexiou S, Patoulias D, Theodoropoulos KC, et al. Intracoronary thrombolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024;38(3):455-466. 13. Bainey KR, Armstrong PW, Zheng Y, Brass N, Tyrrell BD, Leung R, et al. Pharmacoinvasive strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(10):e008059. 14. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, Wilcox R, Danays T, Lambert Y, et al. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(15):1379-1387. 15. Sim DS, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Kim YJ, Chae SC, Hong TJ, et al. Pharmacoinvasive strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a propensity score-matched analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(9):e003508. 16. de Waha S, Patel MR, Thiele H, et al. Relationship between infarct artery, myocardial injury, and outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13:e032441. 17. Huang L, Zhang J, Huang Q, Cui R, Chen J. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23:411. 18. Amon J, Wong GC, Lee T, Singer J, et al. Incidence and predictors of adverse events among initially stable ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e024312. 19. Fang C, Chen Z, Zhang J, Jin X, Yang M. Prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:845667. 20. Shaaban R, El Etriby A, Kamal D. Evaluation of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Egypt Heart J. 2022;74:35. 21. Nozaki YO, Yatsu S, Ogita M, Wada H, Takahashi D, et al. Outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. J Cardiol. 2024;83(2):112-119. 22. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465-2476. 23. Welsh RC, Van de Werf F, Westerhout CM, Goldstein P, Gershlick AH, Wilcox RG, et al. Outcomes of a pharmacoinvasive strategy for successful versus failed fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(6):811-819. 24. Jamal J, Idris H, Faour W, Yang W, et al. Late outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by pharmaco-invasive or primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(Suppl 1):ehad655. 25. Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Schulz S, Iijima R, Keta D, Byrne RA, et al. Prognostic significance of epicardial blood flow before and after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(7):512-517. 26. Denktas AE, Anderson HV, McCarthy J, Smalling RW. Total ischemic time: the correct focus of attention for optimal ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(6):599-604. 27. Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML. Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet. 1996;348(9030):771-775. 28. Murakami T, Sakakura K, Jinnouchi H, et al. Acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Clin Med. 2023;12(10):3411. 29. Aldujeli A, Haq A, Tsai TY, Grabauskyte I, et al. The impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention strategies during ST-elevation myocardial infarction on the prevalence of coronary microvascular obstruction. Sci Rep. 2023;13:11562. 30. Madsen JM, Kelbæk H, Nepper-Christensen L, et al. Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing deferred primary percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(13):1102-1110.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Prevalence of Anemia and Its Association with Respiratory Infections Among Pediatric Patients: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Published: 27/11/2015
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
A Clinical Study of Menstrual Patterns in Women Presenting with Ovarian Masses in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Published: 22/09/2012
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Impact of Early Surgical Menopause on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk: A Prospective Study
Published: 27/02/2015
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Pattern of Acne Vulgaris and Its Association with Lifestyle Factors in Adolescents: A Hospital-Based Study
Published: 30/11/2018
Download PDF
Read Article
© Copyright Journal of Heart Valve Disease