Contents
Download PDF
pdf Download XML
274080 Views
20871 Downloads
Share this article
Review Article | Volume 25 Issue 1 (, 2019) | Pages 39 - 45
Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Mitral Valve Replacement
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery and Oncology.
2
Department of Pathobiology and Medical and Biotechnologies.
3
Department of Statistics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Under a Creative Commons license
PMID : -27989082
Published
Jan. 11, 2016
Abstract

Background: The study aim was to determine the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on early and late clinical outcomes, left atrial and ventricular remodeling, late tricuspid valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients after mitral valve replacement (MVR).

Methods: A total of 46 patients (mean age 66 ± 9.3 years) with mitral valve diseases and undergoing isolated MVR was enrolled in the study. The mitral valve effective orifice area (EOA) was determined using the continuity equation and indexed for the patient's body surface area (EOAi). PPM was defined as EOAi ≤1.2 cm2/m2. PH was defined as a systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) >40 mmHg. Both, clinical and echocardiographic follow up were performed.

Results: PPM was identified in 25% of patients, but no significant differences were observed in baseline and operative characteristics when comparing patients with and without PPM. The NYHA class was improved in most cases after surgery. Indeed, significant decreases in mean transvalvular gradient (from 8.6 ± 2.8 mmHg to 5 ± 1.3 mmHg, p = 0.001), left atrial dimension (LAD) (from 31.9 ±9.8 mm to 29.5 ± 7 mm, p = 0.011), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (from 42.6 ± 18.1 mm to 35.5 ± 6.6 mm, p = 0.044) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (from 55.8 ± 19.2 mm to 48.7 ± 6.1 mm, p = 0.024) were observed over time when comparing preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic data. In addition, at follow up (mean 6.9 ± 1.8 years) there were significant decreases in LAD (from 31.9 ± 9.8 mm to 28 ± 11.1 mm, p = 0.001), left ventricular enddiastolic volume (from 106.9 ± 32.9 ml to 92.3 ± 21.9 ml, p = 0.024), tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (from 87% to 27%, p = 0.002) and PH (from 78.3% to 58.7%, p = 0.043) in all patients. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic, clinical outcome and atrial natriuretic peptide levels of patients with and without PPM.

Conclusions: Mitral PPM does not appear to have any negative effect on ventricular and atrial remodeling, TR and PH during the early and late postoperative periods.

 

 

 

How to cite: Pisano, C., Rita Balistreri, C., Fabio Triolo, O., Franchino, R., Allegra, A., Capuccio, V., Argano, V., & Ruvolo, G. (2016). Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Mitral Valve Replacement. The Journal of heart valve disease25(1), 39–45.

 
Keywords
Recommended Articles
Research Article
Morphometric Analysis of the Human Mitral Valve: A Cadaveric Study
...
Published: 19/08/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Role of Metformin in Modulating Serum Ghrelin Levels in Obesity
Published: 30/12/2023
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Impact of Metformin Therapy on Serum Adiponectin Levels in Obese Individuals
Published: 14/08/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
Research Article
Prospective Study on Functional Outcome of CTEV By Ponseti Method of Cast Application
...
Published: 31/07/2025
Download PDF
Read Article
© Copyright Journal of Heart Valve Disease