Background: Basic Life Support (BLS) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) are essential emergency interventions that can significantly improve survival in cardiac arrest cases. Early training of medical students in these life-saving procedures is vital to build confidence and preparedness. This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitude toward BLS and CPR among first-year medical students. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 45 first-year MBBS students from a tertiary medical college using a pre-validated, self-administered questionnaire. The tool included 15 knowledge-based questions and 10 attitude-related statements. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and percentages, while chi-square tests were applied to identify associations between knowledge and attitude scores. Results: Out of 45 participants, 43 completed the survey (response rate: 95.5%). The mean knowledge score was 8.3 ± 2.5 (out of 15), with only 18 students (approximately 42%) demonstrating adequate knowledge (score ≥10). Meanwhile, 35 students (81%) showed a positive attitude toward learning and performing BLS/CPR. Prior exposure to BLS training was reported by 12 students (28%) and was significantly associated with higher knowledge scores (p < 0.01). No significant gender differences were noted in either knowledge or attitude scores. Conclusion: The study highlights a moderate level of knowledge but a generally positive attitude toward BLS and CPR among first-year medical students. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating formal BLS/CPR training early in the medical curriculum to bridge knowledge gaps and foster skill development.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and Basic Life Support (BLS) are essential emergency procedures aimed at maintaining circulation and ventilation in individuals experiencing cardiac or respiratory arrest. Timely and effective administration of BLS can significantly improve survival and neurological outcomes following cardiac arrest, especially in out-of-hospital settings (1,2). The success of resuscitation largely depends on the immediate actions taken by first responders, underscoring the importance of widespread training and awareness in these life-saving techniques.
Medical students, as future healthcare professionals, are expected to possess a foundational understanding of BLS and demonstrate readiness to respond to emergency situations. However, several studies have shown that knowledge and practical skills related to BLS among medical undergraduates are often inadequate, particularly in the early years of training (3,4). This knowledge gap may delay appropriate intervention and reduce the chances of survival in critical scenarios.
Positive attitudes toward learning and performing BLS have been observed among medical students, suggesting that with proper training, their competence in emergency care can be substantially improved (5). Integrating BLS training into the undergraduate medical curriculum at an early stage may enhance students’ preparedness and confidence, ultimately contributing to better patient outcomes (6,7).
This study aims to evaluate the current level of knowledge and attitude toward BLS and CPR among first-year MBBS students and assess the influence of prior exposure to training on their preparedness.
A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the knowledge and attitude regarding Basic Life Support (BLS) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) among first-year MBBS students at a tertiary care medical college. The study population consisted of all students enrolled in the first-year MBBS program during the academic session. A total of 45 students were approached, and 43 responded completely to the survey, yielding a response rate of 95.5%.
Data were collected using a structured, pre-validated questionnaire designed to assess two domains: knowledge and attitude. The knowledge section consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions focused on core BLS/CPR concepts such as chest compression depth, compression-to-ventilation ratio, and emergency response protocols. Each correct answer was awarded one point, resulting in a maximum score of 15. A score of 10 or more was considered indicative of adequate knowledge.
The attitude section included 10 statements rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” These items evaluated students' willingness to learn and perform BLS/CPR, perceived importance of training, and confidence in applying BLS skills.
The questionnaire was distributed in paper format during a scheduled classroom session after obtaining verbal informed consent from the participants. Ethical clearance was secured from the Institutional Ethics Committee prior to data collection.
Data were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and percentages were used to summarize the data. Chi-square tests were employed to explore associations between prior BLS exposure and knowledge/attitude scores. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Out of the 45 students approached, 43 completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 95.5%. The mean age of participants was 18.6 ± 0.8 years, with 25 (58.1%) males and 18 (41.9%) females.
The overall mean knowledge score was 8.3 ± 2.5 out of a maximum of 15. Only 18 students (41.9%) achieved a score of 10 or higher and were categorized as having adequate knowledge (Table 1). The remaining 25 students (58.1%) were found to have inadequate knowledge levels. No statistically significant difference was observed between males and females in terms of mean knowledge scores (p = 0.47).
Regarding attitudes toward BLS/CPR, 35 students (81.4%) demonstrated a positive attitude, agreeing with statements on the importance of training and willingness to perform CPR if needed. Only 8 participants (18.6%) displayed a neutral or negative attitude (Table 2). The attitude scores did not vary significantly between genders (p = 0.59).
A total of 12 students (27.9%) reported previous exposure to BLS training. Those who had undergone prior training showed significantly higher mean knowledge scores (10.1 ± 2.3) compared to those without prior training (7.5 ± 2.1), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Table 3). However, there was no significant association between prior BLS exposure and attitude scores (p = 0.23).
Table 1: Distribution of Knowledge Scores Among Participants (n = 43)
Knowledge Category |
Number of Students |
Percentage (%) |
Adequate Knowledge (≥10) |
18 |
41.9 |
Inadequate Knowledge (<10) |
25 |
58.1 |
Mean ± SD |
8.3 ± 2.5 |
— |
Table 2: Attitude toward BLS/CPR among Participants (n = 43)
Attitude Category |
Number of Students |
Percentage (%) |
Positive Attitude |
35 |
81.4 |
Neutral/Negative Attitude |
8 |
18.6 |
Table 3: Association between Prior BLS Exposure and Knowledge Score (n = 43)
BLS Training |
Number of Students |
Mean Knowledge Score ± SD |
p-value |
Yes (n = 12) |
12 |
10.1 ± 2.3 |
<0.01 |
No (n = 31) |
31 |
7.5 ± 2.1 |
The findings of this study reveal a moderate level of knowledge and a generally positive attitude toward Basic Life Support (BLS) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) among first-year MBBS students. While only 41.9% of the participants demonstrated adequate knowledge, a significantly higher proportion (81.4%) exhibited a favorable attitude towards learning and performing BLS. These results align with previous research indicating a common disparity between attitude and actual knowledge levels in medical undergraduates (1,2).
Inadequate knowledge among first-year students is understandable, as most medical curricula introduce BLS training later during clinical exposure. Similar studies conducted in India and other countries have reported low baseline knowledge scores among preclinical medical students (3,4). Chandrasekaran et al. observed that only 11% of undergraduate students could correctly identify all BLS steps (5). This underscores the need for early and repeated reinforcement of life-saving skills.
Our study also found that prior exposure to BLS training significantly improved knowledge scores, a trend consistently documented in literature (6,7). Trained individuals often retain core concepts better and are more confident in performing CPR during emergencies (8). A study by Roshana et al. showed that students who had attended BLS workshops scored significantly higher in both knowledge and performance (9).
Interestingly, no significant differences were found in knowledge or attitude scores based on gender, indicating that both male and female students perceive the importance of BLS training equally. This aligns with the findings of Sharma and Attar, who found no gender bias in BLS interest or awareness (10). Positive attitude scores, although higher than knowledge levels, reflect a willingness among students to learn and apply life-saving measures, an encouraging trend noted in several studies (11,12).
The gap between attitude and actual knowledge can be addressed by incorporating BLS training sessions into the early medical curriculum. Evidence suggests that even brief, structured courses can significantly enhance students’ skills and retention (13). Simulation-based training and periodic refresher sessions have proven to be effective in sustaining long-term competence (14). Moreover, the use of modern e-learning platforms and peer-assisted teaching can further support BLS training in resource-limited settings (15).
This study had a few limitations. The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, practical skills were not assessed, which are equally critical in emergency care. Future research should include skill-based evaluations and follow-up assessments to determine knowledge retention.
The present study highlights a moderate level of knowledge but a predominantly positive attitude toward Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among first-year MBBS students. Prior exposure to BLS training was significantly associated with higher knowledge scores, reinforcing the need for early and structured life support education in the medical curriculum. Given the critical role of BLS in emergency response, integrating practical training sessions at the undergraduate level can help bridge knowledge gaps and enhance students’ confidence and readiness to act in real-life scenarios. Future studies should assess long-term retention and skill competence following formal training