Background: Trauma-related deaths represent a pressing public health crisis in India, disproportionately affecting the working-age population. Despite growing awareness, wide regional variations, underreporting, and limited forensic infrastructure hinder effective response and policy formulation. This systematic review evaluates the epidemiological trends, state-wise burden, risk determinants, and forensic insights derived from trauma-related deaths in India. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, NCRB reports, and MoRTH publications from 2010–2024. Eligible studies included original epidemiological analyses, autopsy-based reports, and national datasets. The review compares patterns across states and trauma categories and examines forensic implications in medico-legal documentation and mortality surveillance. Results: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) remain the predominant cause of trauma-related mortality, followed by suicides, homicides, occupational injuries, and accidental falls. States like Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra exhibited the highest incidence, whereas Kerala demonstrated a contrasting pattern with lower homicide rates but higher suicide-related trauma. Young adult males (20–45 years) were consistently the most affected demographic. Forensic autopsy data revealed consistent patterns of injury severity and timing that were often underutilized in official records. Conclusion: Trauma-related deaths in India stem primarily from preventable causes. Strengthening forensic infrastructure, improving intersectoral coordination, and enforcing trauma registries are essential for reducing mortality and ensuring legal accountability.
Trauma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, ranking among the top three causes of death in individuals aged 1–45 years. In India, the trauma burden is disproportionately high due to a combination of rapid urbanization, poor infrastructure, weak enforcement of safety laws, and a fragmented healthcare and forensic system. The World Health Organization has emphasized the urgent need to address trauma as a global epidemic [1].
India, as a low-to-middle income country (LMIC), faces unique challenges in trauma prevention and management. RTAs alone account for nearly 10% of global road fatalities, and India has the highest number of road deaths globally [2]. Furthermore, underreporting of trauma-related deaths, especially in rural and under-resourced areas, obscures the true magnitude of the problem.
This systematic review synthesizes current literature on trauma-related deaths in India, highlighting state-wise variations, patterns of causation, and the vital role of forensic medicine in accurate death certification, medico-legal investigations, and policy advocacy.
A systematic review was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using keywords such as “trauma-related deaths India,” “road traffic accidents,” “suicide mortality,” “homicide in India,” and “forensic autopsy trauma.” Government reports, including NCRB and MoRTH annual datasets (2010–2024), were also examined.
Inclusion Criteria: - Original research studies and national/state datasets (2010–2024) - English-language studies - Indian population-based trauma mortality data - Studies with autopsy or forensic evaluation of trauma
Exclusion Criteria: - Case reports, narrative reviews - Editorials and commentaries without empirical data
Data Extraction and Synthesis: Key variables extracted included geographic location, age, sex, mechanism of trauma, manner of death (accidental, suicidal, homicidal), injury characteristics, and forensic autopsy findings. Comparative tables and visual data (pie charts, flow diagrams) were used to analyze state-wise and cause-wise differences.
Figure 1: PRISMA Flowchart of Study Selection
Major Causes of Trauma-Related Deaths
India’s trauma landscape is diverse. RTAs dominate due to the exponential rise in motorization, poor road engineering, and inadequate enforcement of traffic safety laws. Suicides are the second most common cause, especially in southern states, where pesticide ingestion and hanging are prevalent. Homicides, though less frequent, present serious medicolegal concerns in urban and conflict-prone zones. Occupational injuries and falls are commonly seen in marginalized communities and aging populations, respectively.
Table 1: Major Categories of Trauma in India
Causeof Death |
Typical Victims |
Common Mechanisms |
Forensic Considerations |
RTAs |
Young adult males |
Overspeeding, alcohol use, helmet neglect |
Polytrauma, skull fractures |
Homicide |
All age groups |
Blunt force, sharp weapon, firearm |
Defense wounds, pattern injuries |
Suicide |
Farmers, adolescents |
Hanging, poisoning, burns |
Ligature marks, ingestion signs |
Occupational Injury |
Industrial workers |
Falls from height, machinery-related |
Crush injuries, amputation |
Accidental Falls |
Elderly, children |
Slips, stairs, rooftops |
Subdural hemorrhage, spinal injuries |
Table 2: Comparative State-wise Distribution of Trauma-related Deaths (2022)
State |
RTAs |
Homicide |
Suicide |
Occupational |
Falls |
Uttar Pradesh |
21,655 |
3,261 |
10,875 |
532 |
1,142 |
Maharashtra |
17,355 |
2,875 |
18,056 |
814 |
1,290 |
Tamil Nadu |
15,924 |
1,731 |
14,610 |
407 |
1,008 |
Madhya Pradesh |
14,561 |
2,213 |
13,272 |
398 |
892 |
Kerala |
4,823 |
349 |
9,825 |
214 |
1,352 |
Delhi (UT) |
1,398 |
450 |
2,350 |
123 |
318 |
Sources: NCRB Crime in India 2022; MoRTH Road Accident Report 2022
Figure 2: Pie chart showing Proportion of Major Trauma Causes in National Context
Forensic Implications
Medico-Legal Autopsy: Despite being mandated for unnatural deaths, medico-legal autopsies are inconsistently practiced across India. High-burden states report backlogs and poor documentation. Uniform autopsy protocols can improve quality and legal utility.
Documentation and Reporting: Tools such as the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) are underused. Many postmortem reports lack standardized injury diagrams and histopathological correlation.
Postmortem Interval Estimation: Forensic techniques such as histology, rigor mortis evaluation, and entomology are essential for determining time since death—crucial for criminal investigations—but are inconsistently applied
Our review reveals that trauma mortality in India is driven by systemic inefficiencies. In Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, high RTA and homicide rates reflect infrastructural and law enforcement deficiencies. Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu, though more urbanized, also report significant trauma burdens, highlighting that urbanization alone does not mitigate risk.
In contrast, Kerala demonstrates high suicide rates but low homicide deaths, suggesting socio-cultural and mental health trends play an important role. The variation in occupational injuries across industrialized states underlines the need for robust workplace safety legislation.
Internationally, India’s trauma burden is comparable to other LMICs like Brazil and South Africa, though data integration and trauma registry implementation remain more advanced abroad. Forensic pathology in India must evolve from a procedural necessity to a robust analytical tool to support public health and criminal justice.
Limitations –
Variability in study design and quality across regions - Underrepresentation of northeastern and tribal regions - Lack of centralized trauma registry hampers real-time analysis - Bias due to reliance on secondary data sources
Recommendations –
Create and mandate a national trauma registry with forensic integration - Train medical officers and forensic pathologists in standard autopsy protocols - Link forensic and police databases to improve trauma surveillance - Promote research into state-specific trauma trends for tailored interventions
Trauma-related deaths in India highlight glaring gaps in public health policy, infrastructure, and forensic science. While causes like RTAs and suicides dominate, each trauma category reflects broader social, cultural, and legal factors. A multidisciplinary, evidence-driven strategy is needed to reduce mortality, improve forensic accountability, and protect vulnerable populations.